Category Archives: Arts & Culture

Arts & cultural activities and events in Bricklyn

Why the Bricklyn Longhouse is Central to Community Life

Bricklyn Eagle Masthead

October 7, 2025

Walt Brickman

Note from Editor Walt Brickman: for today’s edition of The Bricklyn Eagle we’ve invited the Chief Historian of the Realm of Bricklyn, Winifred Tiler Jackson, to share her understanding of one of the most important buildings in Bricklyn, the Longhouse.

Outland readers who travel to Bricklyn should understand that they cannot visit the Longhouse, as it is located in that portion of the Realm that lies outside the Great Wall of Bricklyn, an area that remains off-limits to Outland visitors. Nevertheless, we hope Jackson’s insights, and the accompanying images, will give you at least some understanding of this special structure.

I also want to note that this article is dedicated to the memory of the late Elaine Cogan, long-time columnist for the Planning Commissioners Journal.

The Bricklyn Longhouse: Its Design, Uses, and Historical Significance
by Winifred Tiler Jackson
Chief Historian of the Realm of Bricklyn and teacher of history at Bricklyn Hight School

A cheerful LEGO character with red braids in a professional outfit stands in an office filled with books, a globe, and a large map on the wall.
Winifred Tiler Jackson, Chief Historian of the Realm of Brickly, in her classroom at Bricklyn High School. Credit: The Bricklyn Eagle’s Ann Tiler Anderson, with help from Dall E-3 AI.

In an earlier article published in The Bricklyn Eagle, “Understanding the Great Wall of Bricklyn,”I touched on some of the history of the LEGO peoples who lived where the city of Bricklyn now stands.

Quite a few of today’s Bricklynites are descendants of those late 18th century pioneers, who were called the “Little Vermonters” — a name long since supplanted by the appellation “Bricklynites” (just as the location first known as Little Vermont was, in 1812, renamed Bricklyn).

➤ As is the practice of most contemporary Bricklyn historians, we shall refer to the “Little Vermonters” here as “early Bricklynites,” as these people were never legally considered Vermonters either during the days of the Vermont Republic or after Vermont was admitted as a State in 1791 — this despite the heroic service of many of them with Ethan Allen’s Green Mountain Boys during the Revolutionary War.

A group of LEGO figures dressed in historical attire walking in front of a large, intricately designed gray wall with carvings, surrounded by greenery.
Visualization of Colonial-era early Bricklynites alongside a section of The Great Wall of Bricklyn. Prepared by Dall E-3 AI. based on informational prompts from Bricklyn Chief Historian W.T. Jackson.
A sketch of a longhouse with a curved roof, depicting four LEGO-like figures, including a woman in a bonnet and three men in hats, standing in front of the structure.

The original Bricklyn Longhouse was built in 1772 and — quite unfortunately — demolished in 1897.

The only sketch of this longhouse known to remain (and held in the Bricklyn archives) is shown on the right.

This longhouse bore a resemblance in shape to Iroquois / Haudenosaunee📍 longhouses with their curved, barrel shaped roofs. The current Bricklyn Longhouse, built in 1987, has a style which departs from this, in part as it includes a second floor.

📍 What many still refer to as the Iroquois Confederacy is more often now called by its native name, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, which will be used in this article. The Haudenosaunee call themselves, “The People of the Longhouse” or “the people who are building the longhouse.”


A LEGO scene depicting a meeting at Bricklyn High School, featuring a panel of five LEGO figures seated behind a table, facing an audience of seated LEGO figures.
A Bricklyn Federal Council meeting being held in the Bricklyn High School auditorium, for many years the location for Federal Council meetings. Photo from Bricklyn Eagle archives dated October 5, 1963; with assistance from GPT-4o AI.

As Bricklyn grew in size, it outgrew its longhouse. In 1895, the Annual Town Meeting was shifted to the auditorium of the newly built Bricklyn High School.

As can be seen from this photo, the auditorium is a rather drab space without much character, and with no historical connection to longhouses.

It was not until some ninety years later — following a surge in LEGO migrants from Denmark — that plans were set in motion to build a new public meeting space. More on the resulting “1987 Bricklyn Longhouse” shortly.

➤ So readers are clear, from this point on when I refer to the “Bricklyn Longhouse,” I will be referring to the Longhouse, built in 1987, and in use today.


Why Bricklyn Uses a Longhouse for Public Meetings

One of the cherished traditions followed by early Bricklynites was the use of a longhouse for many of their public meetings. This practice was revived with the opening of Bricklyn’s new longhouse in 1987. Today’s Bricklyn Longhouse has served as a good fit for public meetings, as well as for other functions.

Allow me to make three observations:


First, the Bricklyn Longhouse harkens back to longhouses found in rural Denmark, the place from which many early Bricklynites emigrated. While research indicates that these Viking-era longhouses were typically used for housing, they often included livestock stables; a workspace for weaving; and storage of tools and foodstuffs. Some also served as a social and meeting place for feasts and community decisions. These longhouses remained an important historical and cultural memory for quite a few Bricklynites.

A LEGO longhouse surrounded by snowy trees, with a group of LEGO figures dressed in traditional attire standing in front.
Photo of the 1987 Bricklyn Longhouse by The Bricklyn Eagle’s Ann Tiler Anderson, with help of GPT-4o AI.

Above: the warm glow of the Bricklyn Longhouse on a Winter night invites people to attend the public meeting inside. More about the importance of the Longhouse’s scenic location later in this article.


Second, the Bricklyn Longhouse honors the Haudenosaunee Confederacy. The Confederacy was well known to early Bricklynites, especially merchants, as it covered a wide swath of central New York State into southern Ontario. Made up of the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca, and Tuscarora nations, the Confederacy (as noted on the Haudenosaunee website) remains to this day “one of the first and longest lasting participatory democracies in the world.”

The design of the Bricklyn Longhouse draws on several features of meetings of the Haudenosaunee Grand Council. More on this in the next section of this article.


Third, the annual meetings of the Realm of Bricklyn held in the Bricklyn Longhouse largely follow the format of New England town meetings.

New England town meetings typically occur annually, with a moderator and members of the Board of Selectmen (the governing body) present, along with the entire community. Decision-making at town meetings is placed in the hands of town residents 18 years and older. The community, at the town meeting, elects both the meeting’s moderator and the members of the town Board of Selectmen; adopts the annual budget; and can act on a range of other matters. These town meeting practices have also been followed in Bricklyn.


The Uses & Design of the Bricklyn Longhouse

A LEGO figure with a beard and styled hair examines a donut on top of architectural blueprints.
Moshi Saftbrick working on his recent “donut tower” project. Credit Office of Moshi Saftbrick, with help from Dall E-3 AI.

The Bricklyn Longhouse, planned by the then young Bricklyn architect Moshi Saftbrick, opened in 1987.

While the Longhouse is the site of the annual Meeting of the Realm, it also hosts quarterly meetings of the Bricklyn Federal Council, as well as monthly meetings of the Bricklyn Planning Commission.

But quite importantly, the Longhouse is also used almost daily for a wide assortment of events, making it a true community hub. These range from hosting meetings of civic organizations such as the Legotary, to Friday night hoedowns, to drawing classes, and much more. In this way, the Bricklyn Longhouse has become a vital part of community life.

Editor’s note: Hoedowns are one more reflection of the popularity of dancing in Bricklyn life. See also “Dancing in the Street — Every Tuesday Night.”

A group of four LEGO figures sitting in a cozy cabin, gathered around a small brick structure resembling a house.
Kids at play, building a LEGO longhouse on the second floor of the Bricklyn longhouse. Photo by Ann Tiler Anderson, with help from GPT-4o AI.

A highly appreciated section of the Bricklyn Longhouse is its second floor playroom, often used by children while parents are attending a meeting on the ground floor of the Longhouse.

Another key feature of the Longhouse is the central fire that remains lit during all Federal Council meetings held there.

According to Saftbrick, this design feature has its roots in the central fire at Haudenosaunee Grand Council meetings: “The [Confederacy] meetings were held around the eternal fire of the Confederacy, which the Onondaga nation was tasked with maintaining. … The enduring flame of the Council fire to this day represents the unbroken spirit and resilience of the Haudenosaunee people.” Moshi Saftbrick, On Designing a Contemporary Public Meeting Space for the Realm of Bricklyn (Bricklyn University Press, 1991), 134. See also William Fenton, The Great Law and the Longhouse: A Political History of the Iroquois Confederacy (University of Oklahoma Press, 1998), 102.

A LEGO scene depicting a Viking-style longhouse, featuring minifigures wearing helmets and enjoying a gathering around a wooden table with mugs and plates, illuminated by a central fire.
A quarterly meeting of the Realm of Bricklyn Federal Council in the longhouse. Note the central fire / eternal flame; the use of a horseshoe shaped table; the provision of donuts and coffee; and the use of ceremonial Viking-style headwear. Explanations of the purpose for each are described below. Photo by Bricklyn Eagle photographer Ann Tiler Anderson, with help of GPT-4o AI.

➤ As a side note, there is a second eternal light in Bricklyn, the “Ner Tamid” (“eternal light” in Hebrew) found in the main sanctuary of Temple Beth-Shalom in front of the Holy Ark. As Rabbi Rachel B. Weinstein explains, “this light symbolizes God’s eternal presence, and is thus never extinguished.”

“Another meeting room detail that is too often given little thought,” says architect Saftbrick, “is the design and placement of the table council or board members are seated at.” Saftbrick, On Designing, 133. On this point, public involvement expert Elaine Cogan, decried the common practice of board members being seated on a raised dais “high above and yards away from anyone who might want to approach them.” See “Welcoming the Public,” in Planning Commissioners Journal #6 (September/October 1992); Saftbrick, On Designing, 135.

The horseshoe shaped table built for the Bricklyn Longhouse also relates to the Haudenosaunee practice of having chiefs of the nations comprising the Confederacy face each other, sometimes across the fire, instead of being seated in a row. See Fenton, The Great Law, 212. As Saftbrick observed “using a horseshoe shaped table also makes face-to-face conversations much easier to have.” On Designing, 136.

Three LEGO figures enjoy coffee and donuts at a meeting, with a tray of assorted donuts in the foreground and a coffee pot nearby.
Donuts & coffee are provided just outside the longhouse’s main meeting room. Photo by Ann Tiler Anderson, with help from Dall E-3 AI.

When public meetings are held In the Longhouse, donuts and coffee are also available, not just to those at the table, but to all members of the public.

As Elaine Cogan noted, the provision of light refreshments can boost attendance at public meetings and provide for a more relaxed environment. See “Enticements Needed to Woo the Public,” in Planning Commissioners Journal #63, Summer 2006.

Illustration of two Veksö helmets from Zealand, Denmark, showcasing intricate designs with horn-like structures and a bird figure on top.
As can be seen the Bricklyn adaptation of this helmet is not as detailed as the Veksø helmet. Illustration above prepared with assistance of GPT-4o AI.

In the Bricklyn Longhouse meeting room photo (scroll back up the page), you can also see that elected officials, when meeting in the Longhouse, don ceremonial Viking-style helmets, loosely modeled after the ancient Veksø helmets unearthed in Denmark. Their use gives another point of connection to the Danish origins of many Bricklynites.

Interestingly, Haudenosaunee chiefs wore deer antlers during Council meetings. “Symbolic antlers of office marked the chiefs … . Chiefs are crowned with antlers, they are dehorned for misconduct.” Fenton, The Great Law, 102.

Also important to the success of the Bricklyn Longhouse is its scenic location in Westside Park, bordering beautiful Lake of the Pines. See photo earlier in this article.

“A building is diminished,” said Longhouse architect Saftbrick,” if it is not located in a compatible environment … the design team received public feedback that many wanted the new structure to be in an area close to nature; a place with a calming spirit.” Saftbrick, On Designing, 33.

In reviewing potential locations, it quickly became apparent that a wooded site in Westside Park by Lake of the Pines would be ideal. What’s more, the site was close to Bricklyn’s bike and pedestrian pathway and to public transit.” Saftbrick, On Designing, 34-36.

An architectural illustration of a traditional longhouse, showcasing its wooden structure and thatched roof, surrounded by architectural blueprints and design schematics.
Schematic rendering of the 1987 Bricklyn Longhouse. The Longhouse at LEGO scale is 60 in. long x 7 in. wide (converting to human scale, that would be 180 ft. long x 20 ft. wide).
Credit: Office of Moshi Saftbrick; with help from GPT-4o AI.

The design of the Bricklyn Longhouse drew inspiration from Haudenosaunee and Danish sources:

“It is important,” Saftbrick wrote, “to honor our past in our design of public meeting spaces, while meeting current and future needs of the community. This does not mean slavishly copying past designs, but instead, designing new public buildings that provide a sense of continuity married to a vision for the future.” Saftbrick, On Designing, 137.

This point is echoed by the authors of A Pattern Language — Towns, Buildings, Construction, who note that: “People cannot maintain their spiritual roots and their connections to the past if the physical world they live in does not also sustain these roots.” Christopher Alexander et al., A Pattern Language. (Oxford University Press, 1997),132.

Wise words for me to close this article on. ✥


A stylized eagle head design made from colorful LEGO pieces, featuring a bright yellow beak, blue eye, and white feathers, set against a blue background with various colored LEGO dots.

We welcome Letters to the Editor. Please email to: bricklynvt@gmail.com

To the Editor: Bravo to Ms. Jackson for her account of longhouses, in particular the 1987 Bricklyn Longhouse. It was fascinating to read how young Moshi Saftbrick came up with the design. I’ve been to many functions at the Longhouse, and it really has a warmth and character rarely found in contemporary buildings. — Alan Freebrick, South Bricklyn, VT


To the Editor: I had Ms. Jackson as my 9th grade history teacher a few years ago. She’s great at explaining things, and got me interested in learning more about the Outland world. I’ve also been to some events at the Longhouse, I especially like the poetry readings they hold there every month. Nice to listen to poems with friends, with the fire blazing away in the front of the main room. — Alice Plater Sorenson, Bricklyn, VT


To the Editor: My Mom said it was OK for me to write to you, and she’s checking what I wrote before I send this to you. I think it’s me in the picture you have of kids playing in the upstairs part of the Longhouse. I like being there with friends. Hope you like the Longhouse LEGO model we were building. It came out just right, and we now have it on display in the Red Brick School. I’m in fourth grad there. — Nellie B. Thompson, Bricklyn Jct., VT.

Reply from the Editor: Thank you so much for your letter Nellie. For readers who might be interested, Nellie is the girl with blonde hair in the photo we published (with permission of all the children’s parents).


To the Editor: While I like the Longhouse, I do question your putting such a positive light on architect Moshi Saftbrick, given his proposal last year for the design of a skyscraper topped with a donut-shaped revolving restaurant, which would have required tearing down an historic building in the heart of downtown Bricklyn Junction. So much for Mr. Saftbrick’s remarks about the value of “historic continuity.” Fortunately the donut skyscraper project was rejected by the Federal Council. Wish Mr. Saftbrick had stuck to designing longhouses, instead of becoming a “starchitect”! — Larry B. Larsen, Bricklyn, VT.


Set of the LEGO Bricklyn game show, Brickardy

It’s Time for Brickardy!

September 6, 2025

by Gloria Vanderbrick, The Bricklyn Eagle’s culture & entertainment correspondent.

Do you know the name of Bricklyn’s favorite TV game show? If you’re from Bricklyn, the answer is obvious: it’s Brickardy.

Outlanders quickly realize, if they chance to drop in to a bar like the Bricklyn Alehouse while Brickardy is on, that they don’t need any explanation of how the game show works.

All photos in this post by The Bricklyn Eagle, with assistance from Dall E-3 AI.

Bricklynites from all walks of life dream of being contestants.

You can be a history teacher; a llama herder; a weaver; a grocer; a recycler; a spa manager; a scientist; an EMT tech; or a meteorologist. You can be anything and be on Brickardy!

I sat down with Brickardy host Zen Brickthings for a short interview.


Gloria Vanderbrick for The Bricklyn Eagle: Hi Zen. Let me start off by asking you just why you think Brickardy has been such a popular show.

Zen Brickthings: I believe, Gloria, that it’s primarily because of the incredible knowledge and humor of the host! Of course I’m kidding about that … or am I? But really, we have great contestants who know lots and lots of stuff about Bricklyn; and even have a surprising depth of knowledge about the Outland world, which, as you know, we sometimes ask about.”

Zen Brickthings, host of Brickardy.

Most importantly, our viewers love to play along with the game at home, or with friends at, say, the Bricklyn Alehouse. Some will shout out their responses. It almost seems like we can hear them miles away in our studio.

Many viewers marvel at our contestants’ knowledge, and sometimes after a broadcast will look up questions covered in the evening’s show.

Last, but not least, Bricklynites enjoy seeing friendly competition, where no one has a bad word to say about their fellow contestants.

Gloria Vanderbrick: Zen, who prepares all those challenging Brickardy questions? Don’t you run out of ideas?

Zen Brickthings: We’ve got a staff of hundreds who mine every conceivable source of trivia. I jest. It’s just a dedicated staff of three. They’re all Bricklyn trivia nerds, and you might even remember them as former Brickardy champions. So I guess being on our staff is a great career option for some of our contestants! As an aside, I should note that I sometimes wonder how anyone so addicted to trivia has time to work at a full-time job. But that was also me before I landed this gig as the show’s host!

We use the 40 volume Encyclopedia of the Realm of Bricklyn as one of our primary sources, and it includes over 5,000 separate entries. What’s more, it’s supplemented by a wide array of other sources we use — yes that even includes The Bricklyn Eagle — especially when we’re looking to deal with current topics, say, involving music or entertainment.

Brickardy staff working out possible questions and answers for future shows.

Gloria Vanderbrick: I know that Brickardy is no longer a “Bricklyn only” game show. Just how popular has Brickardy become?

Zen Brickthings: Brickardy’s popularity is unmatched among Bricklyn game shows, being ranked most popular the last ten years. This has led to close adaptations of Brickardy in two dozen other Inland Realms. In fact, next Spring there will the first “League of Inland Cities Tournament of Champions.” So those of you in other Inland Realms, stay tuned.


Three contestants in the 2024 Brickardy Teen Challenge.

Gloria Vanderbrick: One more question for you Zen. What’s one of your favorite things about hosting Brickardy?

Zen Brickthings: I’d say it’s the chance to host our annual Brickardy Teen Challenge, now in its fourth year.

The Teen Challenge gives our viewers the chance to see that we have high school students here in Bricklyn who know quite a lot about our Realm, and even about the Outland world beyond us. And it’s good to see that young people can enjoy immersing themselves in a wide variety of subjects.

Gloria Vanderbrick: That’s great to hear! Now Zen, my Editor told me that you’d have a surprise for me tonight.

Zen Brickthings: Yes I do Gloria. Walt Brickman asked me to let you know that as part of a joint project of Brickardy and The Bricklyn Eagle, you’ve been given the assignment of interviewing the nine past Brickardy contestants whose photos are featured near the top of this post. That includes a history teacher; a llama herder; a textile artist; a grocer; a recycling technician; a spa manager; a scientist; an EMT; and a meteorologist — in other words a wide variety of Bricklynites, not just famous celebrities like me.

Gloria Vanderbrick: Actually that should be a very enjoyable assignment. But when you mentioned a big surprise I thought you’d meant I’d be a contestant on Brickardy!

Zen Brickthings: If you complete this new assignment, I’m sure that can also be arranged.

Gloria Vanderbrick: Now that’s something worth looking forward to!


Editor’s Note: We also look forward to Vanderbrick’s reporting. Too often in our paper we’ve focused on celebrities, politicians, and others who are “in the news.” We hope that our Outland readers will get a better feel for what life in Bricklyn is like by Vanderbrick interviewing a cross-section of Bricklynites — though admittedly a cross-section of people who are a bit on the nerdy side!


We welcome Letters to the Editor. Please email to: bricklynvt@gmail.com


To the Editor: Brickardy’s a great family show! So glad you ran this article. I’m already looking forward to Ms. Vanderbrick’s interviews with past Brickardy contestants — great idea. One day I’ll screw up the courage to try out for the show. I especially like categories involving history, and am glad to see you’ll be featuring “Winny” Tiler Jackson. Winny happens to be my son’s (excellent) 9th grade history teacher. As some of your paper’s readers may know, she also volunteers time as Chief Historian of the Realm of Bricklyn. It will be a treat to learn more about Winny. — Sofia Plater Wright, Bricklyn, Vermont


To the Editor: So glad to have Zen Brickthings as host. He certainly has been ably filling the shoes of long-time host, the late Alec Trebrick. I heard that Brickthings was president of the trivia club at Bricklyn University — one more piece of trivia to know! — Thomas Tiler Tillman, Bricklyn Jct., Vermont.


Daguerreotype of Walt Whitman

Bricklyn Eagle Slammed for Use of AI Generated Images

Bricklyn Eagle masthead

May 12, 2025

A logo or banner displaying the text 'My View' in a bold font on a blue background.

Several Outland critics have scolded the Bricklyn Eagle for its use of the Dall-E artificial intelligence (AI) program for generating images. Their claim is that the newspaper’s use of AI for “photos” is both “unethical” and “wasteful,” and that the resulting images are “a pile of s**t.”

Dall E-3 offices in downtown Bricklyn Jct., VT.
Dall-E AI has a staff of 15 working out of Bricklyn Jct., VT. Photo by Bricklyn Eagle’s Ann Tiler Anderson, with aid (not surprisingly) of Dall E-3 AI.

The first charge includes allegations that AI results in the loss of work opportunities by “real” artists and designers, as well as a generalized belief that AI “undermines human creativity.”

The second charge, that AI is wasteful, is based on the allegedly steep energy costs inherent in using image generating AI and its resulting negative environmental impacts.

I’ll leave the third charge about the images being “a pile of s**t” to Bricklyn Eagle readers to decide for themselves.

How The Bricklyn Eagle Has Responded

A scene featuring LEGO minifigures on a street, with one character holding a newspaper and two others holding donuts. A bakery with donut decorations is visible in the background.
Jeff Brickzos in center (with blue suit) celebrating end of 2023 newspaper strike with Newspaper Guild President  Thomas J. Brickify, Jr (on right wearing pressman’s attire). Photo from The Bricklyn Eagle archives.

Bricklyn Eagle Publisher & CEO Jeff Brickzos recently stated, “The Bricklyn Eagle takes these allegations seriously. We believe we currently abide by artificial intelligence use guidelines adopted by the Federal Council of the Realm of Bricklyn, but will ask for their feedback on how we use AI for images. It may well be necessary for The Federal Council to take a fresh look at this issue.”

➤ Note: For current Federal Council policy on the use of AI see “Preliminary Guidance on the Use of Generative AI by Media & Government Agencies.”

Image depicting colorful LEGO bricks and a tree, with the text 'FEDERAL COUNCIL OF THE REALM OF BRICKLYN PRELIMINARY GUIDANCE ON USE OF AI' prominently displayed.

The two primary policies set out by the Federal Council are:
(1) the need “to carefully double- check the accuracy of any sources identified in the use of AI to prevent fake news,” and
(2) the need “to identify in articles, press releases, or broadcasts” whenever content [being used or displayed] is based in whole or in part on generative AI.”

Does it enhance your reading experience to see an AI “approximation” of Walt Brickman (above left) receiving a coveted Brickitzer Prize for his interview of American astronaut Neil Armstrong? You can compare this to an actual photo of Walt Brickman (above right) standing in front of The Bricklyn Eagle offices.

Bricklyn Eagle Editor Brickman has said that “many subscribers have told us they’ve found that AI-assisted photos and graphics enhance their experience in reading The Eagle,” adding that “Outlanders should also realize that Bricklyn law prohibits our publication of photos of those portions of Bricklyn outside the Great Wall of Bricklyn, as well as of interiors of buildings anywhere in the Realm.”

The Bricklyn Eagle’s use of AI for rendering approximations of otherwise prohibited images appears to take advantage of what some might term a loophole in Bricklyn law.

According to Editor Brickman: “The Federal Council guidelines — which we follow — do not permit the publication of photos taken in areas outside the Great Wall or in building interiors anywhere within the Realm of Bricklyn. Our lawyers have told us that AI renderings that may approximate the look of actual buildings or people in these areas can be shown on The Bricklyn Eagle as they do not impinge on reasonable privacy concerns.”

Above left: photo of The Bricklyn Excchange Building, located inside The Great Wall of Bricklyn (NOT AI generated). Above right: AI assisted approximation / rendering of interior of the Bricklyn Public Library on second floor of The Excchange Building.

It is interesting to note that complaints concerning AI have primarily come from Outlanders, not from Bricklynites or other Inlanders. As Brickzos tells it, “Outlanders critical of our practices need to be aware that when it comes to something like regulating AI, it is Bricklyn, not Outland, law and policy that apply. Having said that, we obviously have much in common with the Outland world, and many of our readers are Outlanders.”

Putting aside for the moment ethical or environmental concerns, which I will address shortly, The Bricklyn Eagle’s use of AI seems, at least for now, to stand on solid legal grounds.

Does The Bricklyn Eagle’s Use of AI Stifle Creativity?

One of the claims made by those critics who call the The Bricklyn Eagle’s use AI images unethical is that it stifles creativity andI takes away from the enjoyment individuals get from building LEGO structures or creations.

While at first blush this sounds plausible, the sentiment appears to be based on a human-centric view of the role and use of LEGO, where piecing together LEGO models is viewed as a hobby or project. It also ignores that fact that most LEGO builders, whether Inlanders or Outlanders, follow clearly spelled out instructions — an enjoyable, but hardly creative, exercise.

Milly Plater-Zybrick showing her mother how to use Lincoln Logs.
Milly Plater-Zybrick (in blue-striped shirt) and her mother, Hilma Plater-Zybrick, also President of the Bricklyn Federal Council, engaged in Lincoln Logs construction. Photo by Ann Tiler Anderson, Bricklyn Eagle.

In the real world of Bricklyn, LEGO is generally not viewed as a hobby. In fact, as the Eagle has reported many Bricklyn youngsters actually prefer playing with Lincoln Logs, instead of with the LEGO bricks that surround them.

Indeed, for many Bricklynites AI provides a way to re-engage with LEGO design in creative ways, allowing for the design of elaborate imaginary structures, or, in the case of The Eagle, approximations of actual Bricklyn architectural treasures. Should this be viewed as wrong-headed or unethical?

A detailed LEGO model of an ornate building, crossed out with a large red 'X' to signify prohibition or limitation.
Should this Dall E-3 AI generated approximation of the historic Bricklyn Junction Opera House — located outside The Great Wall of Bricklyn — be banned from publication in The Bricklyn Eagle? I should think not.

It is also worth noting that the LEGO Group [the privately held company that owns LEGO] has recently used AI images of LEGO minifigures in its advertising. While backtracking after some LEGO users complained, the LEGO Group has apparently not ruled out future use of AI generated images. See “LEGO OFFICIALLY Used AI Generated Art” (YouTube).

Energy Impacts of AI and LEGO Use

Another claim made by opponents of using generative AI is that it requires substantial quantities of energy to render the images. What’s more, it is argued, energy consumption will likely increase with the development of AI-generated videos. When asked about this, Bricklyn Eagle Editor Brickman did not deny that AI can be an “energy hog,” but did note that “the Bricklyn Eagle has not used energy intensive AI videos, and has no plans to.”

Of course, absent regulation, tomorrow’s competitive pressures may change today’s verbal commitments.

Energy consumption concerns have also been a focus of LEGO. According to the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, “The LEGO Group has made major strides in reducing energy drawn from fossil fuels. … The output from the investments [in offshore wind projects] now exceeds the consumption from all of LEGO’s factories, stores and offices. … That represents a lot of energy. In 2016 the LEGO group used more than 360 gigawatt hours of electricity to produce 75 billion LEGO bricks.” See “LEGO goes 100% renewable and sets new world record” (ARENA Wire, June 24, 2019).

Bricklyn also primarily relies on renewable energy sources. There is abundant hydro power from the two generating plants along the Brickooski River, enough, according to the Office of the Federal Chancellor, to readily support projected 20 year energy needs. See “Bricklyn’s Energy Outlook: 2025-2045” (unpublished; available on request). Unless there is a dramatic spike in AI use in Bricklyn, energy consumption should not pose a significant problem. However, this is an area the Federal Council should further investigate.

Environmental concerns have long been raised about the disposal of LEGO bricks as they are still almost totally made of plastic. They can take hundreds of years to decompose, and pose an environmental threat.

A vibrant LEGO recycling center with green containers overflowing with assorted LEGO bricks, featuring workers in yellow and green clothing, and a recycling-themed sign above.
An AI rendering of Bricklyn’s main recycling center generated from a photograph by Bricklyn Eagle staffer Ann Tiler Anderson. Given the fact that LEGO parts take hundreds of years to break down, Bricklyn has developed an advanced system for recycling LEGO bricks. We will focus on this in a future article.

As reported in ScienceNews (Mar. 19, 2020): “Earth’s oceans are littered with plastic of all kinds. … Andrew Turner, an environmental scientist at the University of Plymouth in England … and colleagues used an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer to measure the chemical compositions of washed-up Lego blocks, which had been collected by beach cleanup volunteers in Cornwall, England, since 2010. …

… the researchers used their X-ray fluorescence measurements to match weathered Legos with pristine versions of the same bricks kept in collections since the 1970s. Across 14 pairs of matching Legos, the weathered versions had 3 to 40 percent less mass than their mint-condition counterparts. Based on those measurements, it would take an estimated 100 to 1,300 years to completely break down a single Lego brick … .”

The LEGO Group has, to date, had limited success in changing the composition of LEGO bricks to make them more biodegradable. However, the company is making a push to end its heavy dependence on fossil-fuel based plastics. See, e.g., “Lego plans to replace oil-based bricks with renewable plastic as profits soar” (Fast Company, Aug. 30, 2024).

It is clear, however, that as of now use of AI to design virtual LEGO structures serves to reduce the need for physical LEGO bricks made of fossil fuels.

Financial Impacts

If The Bricklyn Eagle were not able to use AI for generating renderings of buildings and characters, it would face the expense of purchasing tens of thousands of LEGO bricks and minifigures, an insurmountable problem given the newspaper’s modest budget.

Does the use of AI by The Bricklyn Eagle take away work from artists and illustrators? “Not at all,” says Bricklyn Eagle Publisher Brickzos, noting that “if we couldn’t use AI images we would simply be running text-only stories when reporting on parts of Bricklyn outside The Great Wall where photos are not allowed. The real losers would be our readers.”

See also comments by Ben Cossy on why LEGO AI art is likely not taking away work from professional artists or illustrators (YouTube link). Cossy’s full YouTube post, “Is AI Art a Problem for The LEGO Community?” provides even-handed consideration of several issues related to today’s Bricklyn Eagle op-ed.

The Relationship Between Technology and Art

Publisher Brickzos also points to the fascination Bricklynites have with the growing number of artists who themselves are making use of AI technology. As Brickzos notes, “last year’s ‘Boundless Perspectives’ exhibition at the Bricklyn Museum of Art featured a number of AI-generated works. Many visitors found these new forms of art thought-provoking. Of course, as with so much in the world of art, there was a wide range of passionately held opinions.”

Two of the AI assisted art works on display last year at The Bricklyn Museum of Art. On left, Bricks & Train, by Frances B. Ireland (aka The FBI). On right, Blindfolded, by Jonas Tiler Jones. For a review of these works and the exhibition.

Writing for nftNow, Eric James Beyer (in Fear vs. Ethics: Where AI Art Critics Go Wrong) says that, “To argue that AI art programs are unethical in that they draw from artists’ work out in the world betrays a misunderstanding and a denial of human nature and creative endeavors. An illustrator or a painter who creates an image does so by pulling from countless influences, including images they’ve seen over their lifetime.”

As Beyer also notes, “There are several other pernicious suggestions that underlie the anti-AI art claims proliferating online recently. Some of the more shameful ones imply that the people using these programs are somehow unworthy of possessing a tool that lets them create. The subtle but specious claim amounts to little more than this: only those who have dedicated their careers and lives to art are worthy of experimenting with such technology creatively.” Beyer concludes that “AI art tools are helping to democratize art.”

An oval portrait of a man with a beard, wearing a white shirt, set within a decorative golden frame.
 “Daguerreotype portrait of Walt Whitman” The New York Public Library Digital Collections. 1853.
Whitman, for one, embraced photography. As University of Iowa Professor Ed Folsom explained, “Photography was one of those activities that came to seem to Whitman to be a perfect match for America … It was an invention suited for a democratic country, one of those technological developments that embodied a uniquely American sense of the world. Photography, after all, was the merging of sight and chemistry, of eye and machine, of organism and mechanism, much as America was …” “Whitman and the Visual Democracy of Photography” (The Mickle Street Review, Rutgers University, 1988).

Some commentators have also found generative AI to be comparable to the start of photography in the second half of the 19th century.

In a blog post titled, “In Defense of AI Art: History Repeats Itself, Again, Again, and Again,” fine art photographer Craig Boehman quotes an 1855 comment in the art magazine The Crayon arguing that ”Photography couldn’t qualify as an art in its own right … [because it lacks] something beyond mere mechanism at the bottom of it.” (The Crayon, Mar. 14, 1855; “However ingenious the processes or surprising the results of photography, it must be remembered that this art only aspires to copy, it cannot invent.”).

 Journalist and critic Jordan G. Teicher in “When Photography Wasn’t Art” (JSTOR Daily, February 6, 2016) notes that: “When critics weren’t wringing their hands about photography, they were deriding it. They saw photography merely as a thoughtless mechanism for replication.” However, a growing number of Americans, including Walt Whitman (one of the most photographed persons of his time), were praising the merits of photography, as it integrated technology and art.

Scott Billings of the University of Oxford Museum of the History of Science notes that even before photography, “Draughtsman and painters would once have used a camera obscura … for making accurate, detailed sketches of scenes — like landscapes or architecture. It was particularly useful for capturing perspective — accurately representing the height, width, depth and relative position of what you can see in the 3D world on a 2D flat surface.”

“There is plenty of evidence,” says Billings, “that masters like Canaletto and Rembrandt used the camera obscura … [and] people still debate whether the Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer used a camera obscura to capture the incredible detail in his exquisite paintings of domestic scenes. Although there’s no written evidence to prove it either way, art historians think, on balance, that he probably did!”

In Italy, sculptors are now using robots to automate the drudge aspects of sculpting, allowing them to focus on those areas of a sculpture that call for their artistic skills. Is that much different than when teams of assistants and apprentices contributed to the work of a master artist?

Listen to Vermont sculptor Richard Erdman on his use of a robotic assistant in this clip from a CBS 60 minutes broadcast — note, the full 60 minutes episode features both friends and foes of how robotic technology is changing the art of sculpture.

New Technologies & People With Disabilities

According to Michael Mace, Manager of Assistive Technology and Accessibility Centers at Indiana University:

Generative AI can help people with disabilities create content that expresses their ideas, emotions, and perspectives, and can do so in different modalities and formats. Imagine the possibilities for someone who yearns to create works of art but can’t use their arms. They now can use text-to-image generators like DALL-E to create visual art based on natural language descriptions. They can begin new works using the tools available to them — in this case, by simply using words.” The upsides of generative AI (The Connected Professor, Indiana University, Spring 2023).

Matt Levin, writing in Marketplace News, explains how generative AI programs have helped people with disabilities to express themselves.

One example Levin cites is of a woman with ALS. “Amie Thornburg was diagnosed with ALS 25 years ago. It’s sapped much of her voice, and she can’t really move any muscles below her head.Over Zoom, she showed me a digital image that looks like an eerie oil painting. In the foreground is a bright red poppy flower, with an ominous eyeball in the middle of the pistil. Thornburg used the AI art tool Fotor to create the image with software that followed her eye movements to type the prompts.” How AI helps some people with disabilities communicate (Jan. 2, 2024).

New technologies have also allowed a cartoonist in Alaska to continue working after coming down with Parkinson’s disease.

See also: Using AI, Steve Gleason creates art for first time since ALS diagnosis (Axios New Orleans, Apr 18, 2024). 

Summing Up:

In My View, The Bricklyn Eagle’s use of AI technology appears appropriate.

Yes, some may find publication of AI generated renderings to be unethical or distasteful. But is it not ironic that fears of AI supplanting the fine arts, including photography, in some ways echo the fears in prior centuries of those disturbed by the use of photography or its predecessor, the camera obscura?

I also do not see adverse financial impacts on Bricklyn artists from the use of AI by The Bricklyn Eagle. In fact, a growing number of Bricklyn artists have been integrating AI into the creation of their works. At the same time, generative AI can make it feasible for people with certain disabilities to create works of art.

Most Bricklynites appear to have no objection to The Bricklyn Eagle’s use of AI generated images. The criticism comes almost exclusively from Outland readers. Of course, these individuals are free to complain, or to simply discontinue reading The Bricklyn Eagle if the use of AI images offends them.

Having said this, I do hope The Bricklyn Eagle will seek to balance its use of AI with its inclusion, where allowed by Bricklyn law, of more photographs of the actual structures and people of Bricklyn.

Nuclear power plant cooling towers emitting steam against a twilight sky, illuminated by facility lights.
Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant, Waynesboro, Georgia. credit: NRC, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

I also applaud The Eagle’s commitment not to publish AI generated films or videos, as those are likely to have much more significant energy impacts — and might well necessitate construction of a nuclear power plant along the Brickooski River, something the vast majority of Bricklynites (with certain exceptions) do not want to see.

Finally, I would recommend that the Bricklyn Federal Council assign David Bricks’s team in the Office of the Chief Prognosticator the lead role in developing mechanisms for monitoring the impacts of AI development. With AI technology changing so rapidly, it is essential to have thoughtful oversight of its implementation. For one model, we can look at what Canada, our friend to the North, has done. ✥

— Richard B. Saunders, Professor of Communications, Bricklyn University.


A colorful, cartoon-style illustration of an eagle's head created from LEGO bricks, featuring vibrant primary colors against a blue background.

We welcome Letters to the Editor. Please email to: bricklynvt@gmail.com

To the Editor: Thanks to Professor Saunders for his thoughtful (though overlong) analysis of the pros and cons of using AI to generate images. In my own use of AI, I’ve found there is some level of skill needed in preparing the prompts used to generate effective images. It is, in its way, a collaborative process between humans/LEGO people and AI technology. At the same time, I can understand the frustration, and even anger, that artists have in dealing with a technology that is rapidly growing more sophisticated.

Perhaps an analogy can be drawn to the Chinese game of Go, where AI can defeat human Go masters, yet at the same time human (and LEGO) players are employing new strategies by learning from AI. — Maurice Tiler Morris, Bricklyn Jct., VT


To the Editor: Oh my!  Bricklyn certainly has its share of controversies.  I think the AI images are just fine.  Walt: keep giving them hell. — Pat D., Vermont


To the Editor: What Professor Saunders only touches on at the very end of his article is the need for government action to set some controls on the too rapid development of AI technology. It is really out of control … and dangerous. This may be an issue not only appropriate for the Federal Council of Bricklyn to address, as Saunders suggests, but also for multi-nation organizations, like our League of Inland Cities or, for humans, the United Nations. In the meantime I urge your readers to set aside an hour and watch a 2024 interview of Yuval Noah Harari and Aza Raskin on the urgent need to slow down and better control the explosive growth of AI technology. — Suzanne Plater Russell, Bricklyn, VT